My uncle is an artist, and for years I have been silently envious of his skill with pencil and paint. I fully intend to help him open a dA profile but he's a bit of a Luddite when it comes to internet-related things. That said, I show him the wonderful things you've all been doing here on a regular basis - we will get him here! Anyway.
As you can probably tell I suffer a little with artistic insecurity so it meant a great deal to me to be able to show him my work for feedback, and it engendered an interesting conversation. The current dA notice in my inbox invites me to discuss what art is - a glorious discussion for anyone. I wondered what the perception of digital photo manipulation would be to one used to more traditional forms.
Is it the process that's important, or the result? Or is it both? I've always been hindered by the thought that one must 'prove oneself' via the process. Uncle Stewart is of the opinion that it's the result, that even though I may feel guilty for using the hard work of others, it is silly to feel bad about it when it's offered as stock and fully credited. To think differently would be to criticise any painters who don't manufacture their own paint.
Thanks Uncle Stew xxx I feel better now.